$18.4B
Public drug program spend — Canada 2023
CIHI, 2023
$550M–$2.75B
Estimated prescription fraud losses annually
Lexology, 2018
Zero
Real-time national fraud detection systems
No federal oversight body exists
5 provinces
With documented verification infrastructure gaps
SK · ON · BC · AB · MB

The same gap, five different systems.

Every province has invested in pieces of the solution — dispensing records, eligibility systems, prescriber registries. None has a protocol that connects them in real time at the point of dispensing. That is the gap Medisyns closes.

Saskatchewan
SK
The core problem
PIP captures what was dispensed. Nothing verifies whether it should have been.

Saskatchewan's Pharmaceutical Information Program (PIP) provides a near-complete provincial prescription record — one of the most advanced in Canada. But PIP is a dispensing record, not a verification engine. It tells you what left the pharmacy shelf. It does not tell you whether the prescriber was authorized, whether the patient was eligible under the correct benefit, or whether the same claim was submitted elsewhere. That verification event has never existed in Saskatchewan.

$833M
Public drug plan spend 2022–23
$16M+
Conservative fraud exposure (2%)
55×
ROI vs. deployment cost
Existing infrastructure
💊 PIP — dispensing record only 🏥 Saskatchewan Health Authority 📋 Drug Plan & Extended Benefits Branch Gap: no real-time payer-side verification
Ontario
ON
The core problem
Three systems each solve a slice of the problem. None of them talk to each other.

Ontario has built more verification infrastructure than any other province — DHDR tracks dispensing history, HNS adjudicates ODB eligibility in real time, and NMS flags narcotic duplication. But DHDR is advisory and read-only. HNS only covers ODB-eligible Ontarians — not the general population. NMS only covers narcotics and controlled substances — not the full formulary. The result: 8 million dual-insured Ontarians and the entire non-narcotic formulary fall outside any real-time verification event. A pharmacy in Ontario can go 15 years without a single inspection.

~$5B
ODB annual drug plan spend
8M+
Dual-insured patients
15yr
Avg inspection gap
Existing infrastructure
📁 DHDR — advisory only, read-only 🔗 HNS — ODB population only 🚨 NMS — narcotics only Gap: no unified cross-system verification
British Columbia
BC
The core problem
PharmaNet is the most complete dispensing record in Canada. It has never had a payer-side fraud layer.

BC's PharmaNet has captured every prescription dispensed in the province since 1995 — 30 years of near-complete dispensing data, accessible in real time to pharmacists, physicians, and health authorities. That maturity is PharmaNet's strength. It is also its limitation: PharmaNet is a dispensing and clinical reference system. It does not verify prescriber authorization against live registry data, does not confirm payer-side eligibility across all benefit tiers, and does not cross-reference duplication across private and public payers. The fraud layer has never been built on top of it.

~$1.5B
PharmaCare annual spend
5M+
Population covered
30yr
PharmaNet history
Existing infrastructure
💊 PharmaNet — dispensing record since 1995 📋 BC PharmaCare — 5M+ covered Gap: no payer-side fraud verification layer
Alberta
AB
The core problem
Alberta tracks opioid deaths through surveillance data. It has no system to prevent the prescriptions that cause them from being fraudulently filled.

Alberta recorded 1,870 apparent opioid toxicity deaths in 2023 — its deadliest year on record. Alberta Health Services administers one of Canada's largest public drug programs through Alberta Blue Cross. Despite the scale of the opioid crisis and the size of the drug program, Alberta has no dedicated pharmacy dispensing audit infrastructure. The provincial Auditor General has focused on financial statements, not drug plan fraud. Surveillance data tracks deaths. No system verifies dispensing in real time before those deaths occur.

~$5.2B
Est. total Rx spend
1,870
Opioid deaths — 2023
Zero
Dedicated dispensing audit system
Existing infrastructure
🏥 Alberta Health Services 📋 Alberta Blue Cross — drug plan administrator Gap: no dispensing verification or audit infrastructure
Manitoba
MB
The core problem
The College of Pharmacists is actively warning of prescription forgeries at scale. The verification layer that would catch them at dispensing does not exist.

Manitoba's College of Pharmacists has issued active warnings to pharmacists about a high volume of forged prescriptions — Percocet and Cotridin are the most common targets, with forged scripts being faxed from out-of-province numbers at scale. Manitoba's Prescribing Practices Program (M3P) monitors prescriber behaviour but is prescriber-focused, not dispensing-focused. The moment between a prescription being issued and a pharmacist dispensing it — the exact moment where a forged script is filled — has no cross-system verification in Manitoba. The warnings exist because the infrastructure to prevent the fraud does not.

~$1.6B
Est. total Rx spend
Active
Documented forgery fraud
M3P
Prescriber-only — no dispense layer
Existing infrastructure
📋 M3P — prescriber monitoring only 🏥 Manitoba Health Pharmacare Gap: no dispensing-side forgery detection

The gap extends to every province that reimburses prescriptions.

Quebec, the Atlantic provinces, and the territories each operate distinct drug plan structures — but the same structural verification gap exists across all of them. The national opportunity grows with each provincial adoption.

Quebec
~$9.5B est. Rx spend
RAMQ operates a distinct formulary and procurement system. French-language strategy required. Identified for Phase 4 after national standard begins forming.
New Brunswick
~$900M est. Rx spend
MaveRX prescription monitoring launched 2024 — early stage with acknowledged gaps. 72 opioid deaths in 2023. Strong eventual target.
Nova Scotia
~$1.1B est. Rx spend
Existing prescription monitoring program publicly criticized by its own designers for failing to flag over-prescribing. Documented systemic failure — clear integration case.
Atlantic & Territories
PEI · NL · YT · NT · NU
Smaller populations addressed through a unified Atlantic or territorial framing once national standard conversations begin with Canada Health Infoway.

Start the conversation

No pitch deck required. If you work in or with provincial health systems and you recognize the problem — leave your details and we'll be in touch within 48 hours.

Patent pending CA & US · Confidential · We do not share your information